It was Peter who cut off the ear

In other Gospels the one who cut off the ear is not mentioned. Gospel of John decides to mention Peter directly.

Additional comments:

The four Gospels provide unique perspectives on the life and ministry of Jesus. When examining the account of the servant of the high priest losing an ear during the arrest in Gethsemane, the Synoptic Gospels refer to the attacker only as one of those with Jesus. Matthew, Mark, and Luke maintain a level of anonymity regarding the identity of the person holding the sword. This deliberate omission serves to highlight the event itself rather than focusing on the individual perpetrator. The Gospel of John breaks this pattern by explicitly naming Peter as the one responsible for the act. This narrative choice highlights the distinct perspective of the beloved disciple. By identifying Peter, John provides a clearer picture of the impulsive loyalty often demonstrated by the apostle. It is a powerful example of how the different writers complement one another to form a comprehensive historical record of the event.